XLANCE-MSR Technical Report for MSR Challenge 2025
arXiv - 2026
Technical report for the XLANCE-MSR system submitted to the first Music Source Restoration Challenge.
Loading...
Reduce noise, crowd sounds or reverb in recordings, compare with the original and download the processed audio.
Input
Supports inputs in formats such as mp3 / wav / flac / ogg / m4a / aac / aif / aiff / mp4 / mov / mkv
Supported formats
Output
WAV
Use case
Clean up recordings with noise, echo or live interference.
Choose a model for your material and purpose, and review the examples before submitting.
Cost, time, formats and parameters depend on the selected model.
Include the tool name, steps and the problem in your feedback. Screenshots can help us locate it.
MelBand RoFormer · Standard: Clean up recordings with noise, echo or live interference.
XLANCE-MSR extends a six-stem BS-RoFormer system into eight-class source restoration with separation, denoising, and dereverberation/restoration. The MIT checkpoint weights are public.
MelBand RoFormer · Aggressive: Clean up recordings with noise, echo or live interference.
arXiv - 2026
Technical report for the XLANCE-MSR system submitted to the first Music Source Restoration Challenge.
arXiv - 2026
Challenge summary paper describing the MSR task, datasets, objective metrics, subjective evaluation, and final ranking tables.
2 output categories
Only records with verified public inference implementations and matching weights are shown; algorithms requiring no weights are also eligible. Closed services, unreleased weights and unmatched experiment versions are excluded. This is not an all-model leaderboard.
Each set of weights appears once per benchmark, using its best published result for the selected metric. An overall score comes from one evaluation. Expand to compare evaluations and settings.
Public weights do not establish a fully open-source license. Expand the data for declared weight licenses and access conditions. Undeclared licenses are marked separately.
Markers identify models or components used here. Scores and settings come from the cited tests, not a new evaluation of the complete site pipeline.
No comparable public results with verified code and matching weights are available.