YingMusic-SVC
- ASR text differenceBest in metric
- 6.8% ↓
- Median pitch error
- 7.27cent ↓
- Extra sound during pauses
- 2.5s ↓
- Reference timbre similarityBest in metric
- 0.978 ↑
- Predicted singing naturalness
- 3.59 ↑
- Predicted perceptual quality
- 7.707 ↑
Loading...
Upload the original song and a target singer reference to change the lead voice without training. YingMusic-SVC / HQ-SVC / SoulX-Singer-SVC / Seed-VC / Vevo2-FM / SaMoye-SVC / kNN-SVC process the same inputs and return separate covers.
Input
An original song or isolated vocals, plus a target singer reference.
Audio formats
Output
Vocal WAV files for the selected models; song mode also includes accompaniment mixes. MP3 previews, original WAV and ZIP downloads.
Use case
Changing the lead voice from reference audio and comparing seven model outputs.
Demo: Far far away, full source 240.98 seconds, one target singer, seed 42 and pitch shift 0. kNN-SVC uses the full reference; the others share a 25-second excerpt. Voice similarity is measured against that same excerpt for every model. These measurements belong to this demo.
Highlights the best value in this group according to each metric’s arrow, including ties; this is not an overall audio-quality ranking.
Lower ↓ or higher ↑ is better. Transcript difference compares Whisper-medium recognition with the source, not manually checked lyric errors. Timbre similarity is Resemblyzer embedding cosine similarity, not identity proof. SingMOS-Pro naturalness and AudioBox PQ are automatic predictions, not human MOS or the paper tables. Leading one metric on this song does not establish an overall winner across songs.
Authors’ results are shown separately by dataset and setting. They do not form a combined ranking of the seven models.
YingMusic-SVC · Table 2HQ-SVC · Table 1SoulX-Singer-SVC · Table 4Seed-VC · EVAL.mdMeasurements and input verificationAuthors’ results are shown separately by dataset and setting. They do not form a combined ranking of the seven models.
Only records with verified public inference implementations and matching weights are shown; algorithms requiring no weights are also eligible. Closed services, unreleased weights and unmatched experiment versions are excluded. This is not an all-model leaderboard.
Choose a dataset to view all metrics for each model. Rows follow the official rank or selected metric. Bold marks each column’s best comparable value, including ties. Different evaluation protocols are ranked separately; missing scores are shown as -.
Deployable entries 9 / source rows 15
A complete public inference package for these experiments has not been verified. Other weights with the same model name do not qualify.
Ours-CPT · Setting 1: GT Leading · Ours-SFT · Setting 1: GT Leading · Ours-CPT · Setting 2: Mix Vocal · Ours-SFT · Setting 2: Mix Vocal · Ours-CPT · Setting 3: Ours Leading · Ours-SFT · Setting 3: Ours Leading
| Metric rank | Model | Test setting | SPK-SIM ↑ | CER(%) ↓ | CE ↑ | CU ↑ | LogF0PCC(%) ↑ | CMOS ↑ | SMOS ↑ |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Ours-FullPublic weights · Inference code | Setting 1: GT Leading | 0.800 | 9.26 | 5.86 | 6.56 | 98.12 | 4.26 | 3.08 |
| 2 | Seed-VC ( Liu, 2024 ) | Setting 1: GT Leading | 0.801 | 10.89 | 5.69 | 6.39 | 98.29 | 3.98 | 3.09 |
| 3 | FreeSVC ( Ferreira et al., 2025 ) | Setting 1: GT Leading | 0.648 | 20.70 | 4.72 | 5.55 | 86.56 | 2.47 | 1.83 |
Includes public test results for models used here and elsewhere. The complete source table is shown by default; conditions and metrics can also be selected for comparison. Scores from different test conditions are not directly comparable.
Only records with verified public inference implementations and matching weights are shown; algorithms requiring no weights are also eligible. Closed services, unreleased weights and unmatched experiment versions are excluded. This is not an all-model leaderboard.
Public weights do not establish a fully open-source license. Expand the data for declared weight licenses and access conditions. Undeclared licenses are marked separately.
The selected model has no verified matching public result and has not been ranked.
Choose a dataset to view all metrics for each model. Rows follow the official rank or selected metric. Bold marks each column’s best comparable value, including ties. Different evaluation protocols are ranked separately; missing scores are shown as -.
Deployable entries 6 / source rows 10
A complete public inference package for these experiments has not been verified. Other weights with the same model name do not qualify.
GroundTruth · GMO-SVS Dataset · Vevo-SVC · GMO-SVS Dataset · GroundTruth · SoulX-Singer-Eval Dataset · Vevo-SVC · SoulX-Singer-Eval Dataset
Only rows using the stated protocol are shown.
| Metric rank | Model | Test setting | GMO-SVS Dataset · Chinese | GMO-SVS Dataset · English | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| WER ↓ | SIM ↑ | FFE ↓ | SingMOS ↑ | Sheet ↑ | WER ↓ | SIM ↑ | FFE ↓ | SingMOS ↑ | Sheet ↑ | |||
| 1 | SoulX-Singer (Melody) | GMO-SVS Dataset | 0.065 | 0.897 | 0.044 | 4.458 | 4.110 | 0.151 | 0.918 | 0.036 | 4.323 | 3.751 |
| 2 | SoulX-Singer-SVC | GMO-SVS Dataset | 0.107 | 0.904 | 0.036 | 4.419 | 4.029 | 0.267 | 0.919 | 0.030 | 4.314 | 3.666 |
| 3 | YingMusic-SVCPublic weights · Inference code | GMO-SVS Dataset | 0.097 | 0.908 | 0.057 | 4.399 | 3.974 | 0.243 | 0.923 | 0.046 | 4.337 | 3.708 |
Datasets, versions and conditions remain separate, including sources with no eligible ranking rows.
Deployable entries 6 / source rows 10
A complete public inference package for these experiments has not been verified. Other weights with the same model name do not qualify.
GroundTruth · GMO-SVS Dataset · Vevo-SVC · GMO-SVS Dataset · GroundTruth · SoulX-Singer-Eval Dataset · Vevo-SVC · SoulX-Singer-Eval Dataset
Scores apply to the listed dataset, metric and model version; results from different tests are not directly comparable.
Choose a dataset to view all metrics for each model. Rows follow the official rank or selected metric. Bold marks each column’s best comparable value, including ties. Different evaluation protocols are ranked separately; missing scores are shown as -.
Deployable entries 6 / source rows 10
A complete public inference package for these experiments has not been verified. Other weights with the same model name do not qualify.
GroundTruth · GMO-SVS Dataset · Vevo-SVC · GMO-SVS Dataset · GroundTruth · SoulX-Singer-Eval Dataset · Vevo-SVC · SoulX-Singer-Eval Dataset
Only rows using the stated protocol are shown.
| Metric rank | Model | Test setting | GMO-SVS Dataset · Chinese | GMO-SVS Dataset · English | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| WER ↓ | SIM ↑ | FFE ↓ | SingMOS ↑ | Sheet ↑ | WER ↓ | SIM ↑ | FFE ↓ | SingMOS ↑ | Sheet ↑ | |||
| 1 | SoulX-Singer (Melody) | GMO-SVS Dataset | 0.065 | 0.897 | 0.044 | 4.458 | 4.110 | 0.151 | 0.918 | 0.036 | 4.323 | 3.751 |
| 2 | SoulX-Singer-SVC | GMO-SVS Dataset | 0.107 | 0.904 | 0.036 | 4.419 | 4.029 | 0.267 | 0.919 | 0.030 | 4.314 | 3.666 |
| 3 | YingMusic-SVCPublic weights · Inference code | GMO-SVS Dataset | 0.097 | 0.908 | 0.057 | 4.399 | 3.974 | 0.243 | 0.923 | 0.046 | 4.337 | 3.708 |
Include the tool name, steps and the problem in your feedback. Screenshots can help us locate it.